ADU News

Granny Flat Fever

Shawn Mizrachi, owner of West L.A.-based MDM Customer Remodeling, has seen his accessory dwelling unit business spike since 2017, when state laws began to favor the building types.

Accessory dwelling units, or ADUs — also known colloquially as granny flats — were seen by some as a way of addressing the affordable housing crisis. Their creation accelerated during the pandemic and is continuing to grow, according to experts and a new report. Among the reasons why ADUs are increasing in popularity now is an easier regulatory process to get the units approved.

ADUs, secondary housing units with independent living facilities on a residential lot in addition to the main house, are typically converted garages or freestanding units in the backyard.

Mizrachi said that 60% of his ADU projects are garage conversions and 40% are ground up projects.

According to Mizrachi, there are three scenarios behind the build of an ADU: moving a relative onto the property; needing more space to work from home — an event that accelerated during the pandemic; and rental income.

“Those are the three types of customers,” he said.

 

Rising demand

San Francisco-based ADU builder Cottage — which has offices in Los Angeles and San Diego — recently released its 2022 ADU Impact Report looking at the rising demand for ADUs in California. The report found that Southern California remains the hottest ADU market in the country and demand outpaces actual builds: For every three ADU permits submitted in 2021, only one had resulted in a completed dwelling by the end of last year.

Alex Czarnecki, founder and chief executive of Cottage, said “60% of ADU permits from California were in L.A. in 2022.”

 

A gate at home with an ADU in the background, left. MDM Owner Shawn Mizrachi at an ADU property in Culver City.

 

But while  California has made it easier to get ADUs approved, it is still a difficult process to navigate, said Czarnecki, as to why only one ADU for every three permits sought results in a build. Czarnecki, who comes from a tech background, formed Cottage after his own experience creating an ADU in 2020.

“I was building an ADU for my parents to help them age in place and fell into all of the traps that a homeowner falls into: feasibility, understanding what’s possible on your property, architectural design, navigating city permitting and finding and working with the right general contractor,” Czarnecki said.

He formed Cottage at the height of the pandemic.

“People stuck at home (were) thinking about, ‘What if I had a little bit of extra space?’” Czarnecki said. “The longer you spend at home, the longer you think of improving it. We saw this interesting dynamic of during the pandemic a lot of families looking to bring their elderly parents out of the senior living center to be closer together.”

Czarnecki believes the pandemic was only one factor boosting the ADU space.

“The other boost which happened on pretty similar timing was regulatory,” Czarnecki said. “Across California, the state has continued to pass, year by year, additional legislation that makes it easier for homeowners to build ADUs. The ADU space has been doubling year over year since 2018 in a lot of these markets.”

 

Rules and regulations

Even though California had begun to relax rules and regulations about creating ADUs in 2017, Gov. Gavin Newsom more recently removed other obstacles for Californians interested in building ADUs.

The new laws went into effect in 2020. Among the directives: Californians are now permitted to create two ADUs on a single-family zoned property, one full accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit, or JADU. A JADU can be a maximum of 500 square feet and is created by converting part of an existing residence.

Beginning in 2020, homeowners could also build a detached ADU spanning 800 square feet and 16 feet tall without any local discretionary approvals. ADUs created by conversions were also granted automatic approval. Many of the requirements regarding parking and setbacks have also been minimized, and ADUs can also be added to multifamily dwellings, either in spaces such as carports and storage rooms, or, in the absence of such spare spaces, two ground-up detached ADUs can be built.

Facilitating ADU building is the mandate that California cities approve or deny ADU projects within 60 days of receipt of application. (Prior to 2020, the window of time edged 120 days.)

The result of the state laws has been reflected in the number of permits issued. From 2017 to 2021, the number of ADU permits issued in the city of Los Angeles increased by 202%. From Jan. 1 to Aug. 31, 2021, a total of 3,371 ADU permits were issued, and by the end of the year, 5,188 permits were given a green light, according to publicly available Department of Building and Safety data. The figure was surpassed last year, as 4,999 permits were issued in the first eight months of 2022.

 

Complicated process

Ray and Lesley Joelson, who run the architectural firm EZPlans in Woodland Hills, said that one out of every three inquiry calls they receive are regarding ADUs.

The average cost for a garage conversion is $150,000 while new construction could cost between $300,000 and $500,000, depending on the specifics, such as if the ADU is being built on a hillside property.

“The garage conversion is very appealing to so many people because it’s adding value to their house,” Lesley Joelson said. “Garage conversions are the least expensive way for a homeowner to create an ADU. At least 65% of the ADUs we do are garage conversions.”

Ray Joelson said that many clients seek to take advantage of what the law allows.

“If you have a two-car garage, you’re going to capture 400 square feet,” Ray Joelson said. “The typical law allows you about 1,200 square feet. So if people are looking to maximize their return on investment on building an ADU, those clients don’t go for the garage conversions, they tend to go for the new detached two story, 1,200 square foot maximum square footage in the backyard. To maximize the rental square footage and valuation on your property then you’d go for the detached ADU.”

The Joelsons note that despite the state law, the rules for building an ADU may differ depending on the community. For example, Burbank and Pasadena don’t allow ADUs to exceed 800 square feet.

“While the state has very ambitious goals to try to solve the housing crisis, some of these jurisdictions have conflicting requirements,” Ray Joelson said. “Not everybody is fully gung-ho about letting everybody build rental units on their property, but the state wants them to solve the shortage of housing. So they have different strategies of interpreting the law.”

Ray Joelson gives as an example a client he had in Venice.

“Those lots in Venice are very small and parking is an absolute nightmare,” he said. “So while at a state level you’re not required to have additional parking when you build an ADU, if you convert a garage in Venice, they do require you to find substitute parking. We’re doing a project there right now where there’s even conflict within the city’s Building Department versus the Planning Department inside of Venice. The Building Department was quite fine with losing the parking by converting the garage, but the Planning Department said, ‘Sorry, streets are too busy. We can’t figure any more cars here.’ They forced the architect to design an on-property parking space.”

Lesley Joelson explained that there are often discrepancies between the state and individual municipalities.

“The state sets the guidelines for ADUs but the various city jurisdictions often overlay additional restrictions and limitations on elements like the height and size of ADUs, or parking restrictions,” she said. “This is a very contentious issue, and creates a lot of confusion for homeowners. The individual cities are ultimately in control because they approve the building permit.”

Lesley Joelson gives yet another example of a client facing municipal minutiae.

“In Manhattan Beach, he wants to go to a two-story so he could still have some backyard for his children to play in,” she said. “He was very disappointed that he couldn’t go to a two-story ADU.”

Ray Joelson said that complications also arise when dealing with overlay zones.

“If that property falls within a special overlay zone, the rules become even more ridiculous,” he said. “In a historic zone, a whole bunch of different rules have to apply. (Also) if you’re in a coastal commission overlay, if you’re in a hillside property versus a flat lot.”

EZPlans helps clients navigate the nuances of building ADUs in different neighborhoods.

“What we try to do is do our due diligence before we take on a client so we’re very transparent and honest with what we can achieve or can’t achieve,” Ray Joelson said. “We’ve had to make clients aware that your wish list is not going to fly very well with the city.”

Shawn Mizrachi, owner of West L.A.-based MDM Customer Remodeling, has seen his accessory dwelling unit business spike since 2017, when state laws began to favor the building types.

Accessory dwelling units, or ADUs — also known colloquially as granny flats — were seen by some as a way of addressing the affordable housing crisis. Their creation accelerated during the pandemic and is continuing to grow, according to experts and a new report. Among the reasons why ADUs are increasing in popularity now is an easier regulatory process to get the units approved.

ADUs, secondary housing units with independent living facilities on a residential lot in addition to the main house, are typically converted garages or freestanding units in the backyard.

Mizrachi said that 60% of his ADU projects are garage conversions and 40% are ground up projects.

According to Mizrachi, there are three scenarios behind the build of an ADU: moving a relative onto the property; needing more space to work from home — an event that accelerated during the pandemic; and rental income.

“Those are the three types of customers,” he said.

 

Rising demand
San Francisco-based ADU builder Cottage — which has offices in Los Angeles and San Diego — recently released its 2022 ADU Impact Report looking at the rising demand for ADUs in California. The report found that Southern California remains the hottest ADU market in the country and demand outpaces actual builds: For every three ADU permits submitted in 2021, only one had resulted in a completed dwelling by the end of last year.

Alex Czarnecki, founder and chief executive of Cottage, said “60% of ADU permits from California were in L.A. in 2022.”

 

A gate at home with an ADU in the background, left. MDM Owner Shawn Mizrachi at an ADU property in Culver City. 

But while  California has made it easier to get ADUs approved, it is still a difficult process to navigate, said Czarnecki, as to why only one ADU for every three permits sought results in a build. Czarnecki, who comes from a tech background, formed Cottage after his own experience creating an ADU in 2020.

“I was building an ADU for my parents to help them age in place and fell into all of the traps that a homeowner falls into: feasibility, understanding what’s possible on your property, architectural design, navigating city permitting and finding and working with the right general contractor,” Czarnecki said.

He formed Cottage at the height of the pandemic.

“People stuck at home (were) thinking about, ‘What if I had a little bit of extra space?’” Czarnecki said. “The longer you spend at home, the longer you think of improving it. We saw this interesting dynamic of during the pandemic a lot of families looking to bring their elderly parents out of the senior living center to be closer together.”

Czarnecki believes the pandemic was only one factor boosting the ADU space.

“The other boost which happened on pretty similar timing was regulatory,” Czarnecki said. “Across California, the state has continued to pass, year by year, additional legislation that makes it easier for homeowners to build ADUs. The ADU space has been doubling year over year since 2018 in a lot of these markets.”

 

Rules and regulations
Even though California had begun to relax rules and regulations about creating ADUs in 2017, Gov. Gavin Newsom more recently removed other obstacles for Californians interested in building ADUs.

The new laws went into effect in 2020. Among the directives: Californians are now permitted to create two ADUs on a single-family zoned property, one full accessory dwelling unit and one junior accessory dwelling unit, or JADU. A JADU can be a maximum of 500 square feet and is created by converting part of an existing residence.

Beginning in 2020, homeowners could also build a detached ADU spanning 800 square feet and 16 feet tall without any local discretionary approvals. ADUs created by conversions were also granted automatic approval. Many of the requirements regarding parking and setbacks have also been minimized, and ADUs can also be added to multifamily dwellings, either in spaces such as carports and storage rooms, or, in the absence of such spare spaces, two ground-up detached ADUs can be built.

Facilitating ADU building is the mandate that California cities approve or deny ADU projects within 60 days of receipt of application. (Prior to 2020, the window of time edged 120 days.)

The result of the state laws has been reflected in the number of permits issued. From 2017 to 2021, the number of ADU permits issued in the city of Los Angeles increased by 202%. From Jan. 1 to Aug. 31, 2021, a total of 3,371 ADU permits were issued, and by the end of the year, 5,188 permits were given a green light, according to publicly available Department of Building and Safety data. The figure was surpassed last year, as 4,999 permits were issued in the first eight months of 2022.

 

Complicated process
Ray and Lesley Joelson, who run the architectural firm EZPlans in Woodland Hills, said that one out of every three inquiry calls they receive are regarding ADUs.

The average cost for a garage conversion is $150,000 while new construction could cost between $300,000 and $500,000, depending on the specifics, such as if the ADU is being built on a hillside property.

“The garage conversion is very appealing to so many people because it’s adding value to their house,” Lesley Joelson said. “Garage conversions are the least expensive way for a homeowner to create an ADU. At least 65% of the ADUs we do are garage conversions.”

Ray Joelson said that many clients seek to take advantage of what the law allows.

“If you have a two-car garage, you’re going to capture 400 square feet,” Ray Joelson said. “The typical law allows you about 1,200 square feet. So if people are looking to maximize their return on investment on building an ADU, those clients don’t go for the garage conversions, they tend to go for the new detached two story, 1,200 square foot maximum square footage in the backyard. To maximize the rental square footage and valuation on your property then you’d go for the detached ADU.”

The Joelsons note that despite the state law, the rules for building an ADU may differ depending on the community. For example, Burbank and Pasadena don’t allow ADUs to exceed 800 square feet.

“While the state has very ambitious goals to try to solve the housing crisis, some of these jurisdictions have conflicting requirements,” Ray Joelson said. “Not everybody is fully gung-ho about letting everybody build rental units on their property, but the state wants them to solve the shortage of housing. So they have different strategies of interpreting the law.”

Ray Joelson gives as an example a client he had in Venice.

“Those lots in Venice are very small and parking is an absolute nightmare,” he said. “So while at a state level you’re not required to have additional parking when you build an ADU, if you convert a garage in Venice, they do require you to find substitute parking. We’re doing a project there right now where there’s even conflict within the city’s Building Department versus the Planning Department inside of Venice. The Building Department was quite fine with losing the parking by converting the garage, but the Planning Department said, ‘Sorry, streets are too busy. We can’t figure any more cars here.’ They forced the architect to design an on-property parking space.”

Lesley Joelson explained that there are often discrepancies between the state and individual municipalities.

“The state sets the guidelines for ADUs but the various city jurisdictions often overlay additional restrictions and limitations on elements like the height and size of ADUs, or parking restrictions,” she said. “This is a very contentious issue, and creates a lot of confusion for homeowners. The individual cities are ultimately in control because they approve the building permit.”

Lesley Joelson gives yet another example of a client facing municipal minutiae.

“In Manhattan Beach, he wants to go to a two-story so he could still have some backyard for his children to play in,” she said. “He was very disappointed that he couldn’t go to a two-story ADU.”

Ray Joelson said that complications also arise when dealing with overlay zones.

“If that property falls within a special overlay zone, the rules become even more ridiculous,” he said. “In a historic zone, a whole bunch of different rules have to apply. (Also) if you’re in a coastal commission overlay, if you’re in a hillside property versus a flat lot.”

EZPlans helps clients navigate the nuances of building ADUs in different neighborhoods.

“What we try to do is do our due diligence before we take on a client so we’re very transparent and honest with what we can achieve or can’t achieve,” Ray Joelson said. “We’ve had to make clients aware that your wish list is not going to fly very well with the city.”

Granny Flat Fever  Los Angeles Business Journal

Read More...

Ready to live in an 800-square-foot house? Lacey is issuing permits for unique option

Contractor Cole Kelly is currently building a accessory dwelling unit for the Barrett family in the Lacey area.


Steve Bloom

sbloom@theolympan.com

The Barrett family of Lacey had to make some important decisions about their future housing needs, finally deciding that a family member would downsize into a new accommodation to free up space at an existing residence.

Such a move might sound familiar to many families trying to care for an older parent who still wants to remain nearby.

But for Mary Barrett, who has lived in Lacey’s Brentwood neighborhood for more than 30 years, she isn’t downsizing into a single-family home or an apartment. She will be moving all of 20 feet into an 800-square-foot accessory dwelling unit.

What’s an ADU? An ADU is a tiny home-like structure that exists as an accessory to a primary residence, either attached to the home or detached from it, and is viewed as one of the growing options to address Washington state’s housing shortage. Between 2000 and 2015, the state’s housing supply fell short of growth by 225,000 units, according to Gov. Jay Inslee’s Office.

The result has been a limited supply of single-family homes, a surge in apartment construction, and enough demand to make the cost of buying a home and paying rent increasingly expensive.

The median price of a Thurston County home continues to hover around $500,000, while average rents in the county are just under $1,500 a month, according to Thurston Regional Planning Council data. In a little more than a decade, the cost of buying or renting has just about doubled in expense, the data show.

In response, some local governments have taken steps to encourage what is known as the “missing middle,” the other types of housing that fall somewhere between a house and apartment, such as a duplex, triplex, fourplex or ADU.

A cold start

Lacey rolled out its ADU program in 2020 and 2021, the two years forever associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. But in 2022 the program showed signs of life, with the city issuing four ADU permits, said Ryan Andrews, Lacey’s planning commission manager.

The city is offering four approved design plans: A 480-square-foot studio, a 600-square-foot one bedroom and two 800-square-foot options — a single-story two bedroom and a two-story two bedroom unit.

Why isn’t the city issuing more ADU permits? One reason is much of Lacey’s housing stock was built in the 1990s, Andrews said, when homes were being built on tiny lots. However, many of the city’s older neighborhoods have much larger lots.

Andrews said he thinks it’s just going to take time for people to recognize those reinvestment opportunities.

One such area can be found south of Lacey Boulevard and north of 37th Avenue, between Golf Club Road to the west and Ruddell Road to the east. The Brentwood neighborhood happens to be in this area. It’s also near Wonderwood Park.

That’s where the Barrett family home is, on one-third of an acre, according to Thurston County Assessor’s Office data. That is plenty of room for an ADU. When Lacey officials talk about the program, they typically refer to 10,000-square-foot lots as the appropriate size for ADUs, although lots smaller than that will work, too, Andrews said.

Mary is downsizing into the ADU so that she can age in place and still be close to her sons, who will move into the primary residence.

One of her sons is a longtime renter, she said.

“After a while it just gets old, moving from house to house,” Barrett said.

She considered buying a home and renting it to her sons, but that was too expensive.

In this arrangement, her sons have stable housing, and after she passes on, they have other options, she said. They could sell the house and ADU, they could rent the ADU, or one son could live in the ADU while the other lives in the primary residence.

Is it affordable housing?

Mary’s 800-square-foot ADU is being built by Cole Kelly of Kelly & Associates LLC, an 18-month-old Olympia-based contractor. This is his first ADU project under his shingle, although he has built them before for other employers, he said.

Kelly began work on the project in January and expects to finish toward the end of April. In addition to the two bedrooms, it has a kitchen, bathroom and a small living area. His budget is around $224,000, although it could be less than that due to some Lacey incentives.

Kelly budgeted $15,000 for building permit fees, but the city is only going to charge him $1,600, he said. The city is also waiving the fees associated with connecting to city water and sewer.

That’s a major savings, he said. Instead of having to run water and sewer connections out to the street, he was able to tie into the home’s existing system.

Still, he acknowledged that even building an ADU comes with its share of costs. He hired subcontractors for the project and Kelly said he is conscientious about the types of building materials he uses, favoring higher quality materials over off-the-shelf materials.

What would he charge in monthly rent for an 800-square-foot ADU? Based on his expenses, Kelly thinks it would still be $1,500 to $2,000 per month, which is right around the average cost of rent in the county.

If he were building Lacey’s 480-square-foot ADU, Kelly said he didn’t think he could do it for less than $100,000, although he is encouraged by Lacey’s steps to streamline the process. That could put rent closer to an affordable range.

Olympia Master Builders supports the ADU.

“As an organization we’ve been working with local jurisdictions to adopt ADU policies for a few years now,” Executive Officer Angela White said. “We feel that ADUs are one more way to increase housing stock in a community. OMB is always a proponent of jurisdictions having a broad range of options when it comes to housing people.”

Rolf has worked at The Olympian since August 2005. He covers breaking news, the city of Lacey and business for the paper. Rolf graduated from The Evergreen State College in 1990.

Contractor Cole Kelly is currently building a accessory dwelling unit for the Barrett family in the Lacey area.

Steve Bloom

sbloom@theolympan.com

The Barrett family of Lacey had to make some important decisions about their future housing needs, finally deciding that a family member would downsize into a new accommodation to free up space at an existing residence.
Such a move might sound familiar to many families trying to care for an older parent who still wants to remain nearby.
But for Mary Barrett, who has lived in Lacey’s Brentwood neighborhood for more than 30 years, she isn’t downsizing into a single-family home or an apartment. She will be moving all of 20 feet into an 800-square-foot accessory dwelling unit.

What’s an ADU? An ADU is a tiny home-like structure that exists as an accessory to a primary residence, either attached to the home or detached from it, and is viewed as one of the growing options to address Washington state’s housing shortage. Between 2000 and 2015, the state’s housing supply fell short of growth by 225,000 units, according to Gov. Jay Inslee’s Office.
The result has been a limited supply of single-family homes, a surge in apartment construction, and enough demand to make the cost of buying a home and paying rent increasingly expensive.
The median price of a Thurston County home continues to hover around $500,000, while average rents in the county are just under $1,500 a month, according to Thurston Regional Planning Council data. In a little more than a decade, the cost of buying or renting has just about doubled in expense, the data show.
In response, some local governments have taken steps to encourage what is known as the “missing middle,” the other types of housing that fall somewhere between a house and apartment, such as a duplex, triplex, fourplex or ADU.
A cold startLacey rolled out its ADU program in 2020 and 2021, the two years forever associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. But in 2022 the program showed signs of life, with the city issuing four ADU permits, said Ryan Andrews, Lacey’s planning commission manager.
The city is offering four approved design plans: A 480-square-foot studio, a 600-square-foot one bedroom and two 800-square-foot options — a single-story two bedroom and a two-story two bedroom unit.
Why isn’t the city issuing more ADU permits? One reason is much of Lacey’s housing stock was built in the 1990s, Andrews said, when homes were being built on tiny lots. However, many of the city’s older neighborhoods have much larger lots.
Andrews said he thinks it’s just going to take time for people to recognize those reinvestment opportunities.

One such area can be found south of Lacey Boulevard and north of 37th Avenue, between Golf Club Road to the west and Ruddell Road to the east. The Brentwood neighborhood happens to be in this area. It’s also near Wonderwood Park.
That’s where the Barrett family home is, on one-third of an acre, according to Thurston County Assessor’s Office data. That is plenty of room for an ADU. When Lacey officials talk about the program, they typically refer to 10,000-square-foot lots as the appropriate size for ADUs, although lots smaller than that will work, too, Andrews said.
Mary is downsizing into the ADU so that she can age in place and still be close to her sons, who will move into the primary residence.

One of her sons is a longtime renter, she said.
“After a while it just gets old, moving from house to house,” Barrett said.
She considered buying a home and renting it to her sons, but that was too expensive.
In this arrangement, her sons have stable housing, and after she passes on, they have other options, she said. They could sell the house and ADU, they could rent the ADU, or one son could live in the ADU while the other lives in the primary residence.

Is it affordable housing?Mary’s 800-square-foot ADU is being built by Cole Kelly of Kelly & Associates LLC, an 18-month-old Olympia-based contractor. This is his first ADU project under his shingle, although he has built them before for other employers, he said.
Kelly began work on the project in January and expects to finish toward the end of April. In addition to the two bedrooms, it has a kitchen, bathroom and a small living area. His budget is around $224,000, although it could be less than that due to some Lacey incentives.
Kelly budgeted $15,000 for building permit fees, but the city is only going to charge him $1,600, he said. The city is also waiving the fees associated with connecting to city water and sewer.

That’s a major savings, he said. Instead of having to run water and sewer connections out to the street, he was able to tie into the home’s existing system.
Still, he acknowledged that even building an ADU comes with its share of costs. He hired subcontractors for the project and Kelly said he is conscientious about the types of building materials he uses, favoring higher quality materials over off-the-shelf materials.
What would he charge in monthly rent for an 800-square-foot ADU? Based on his expenses, Kelly thinks it would still be $1,500 to $2,000 per month, which is right around the average cost of rent in the county.

If he were building Lacey’s 480-square-foot ADU, Kelly said he didn’t think he could do it for less than $100,000, although he is encouraged by Lacey’s steps to streamline the process. That could put rent closer to an affordable range.
Olympia Master Builders supports the ADU.
“As an organization we’ve been working with local jurisdictions to adopt ADU policies for a few years now,” Executive Officer Angela White said. “We feel that ADUs are one more way to increase housing stock in a community. OMB is always a proponent of jurisdictions having a broad range of options when it comes to housing people.”

Rolf has worked at The Olympian since August 2005. He covers breaking news, the city of Lacey and business for the paper. Rolf graduated from The Evergreen State College in 1990.

Ready to live in an 800-square-foot house? Lacey is issuing permits for unique option  The Olympian

Read More...

State, Bellingham on separate tracks to ease ADU rules

While Bellingham leaders consider loosening rules for accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, a state senator from Bellingham is pushing a bill that would go even further to encourage the construction of backyard cottages on the same lot as single-family homes.

Sen. Sharon Shewmake is the lead sponsor of what is essentially the same legislation she championed in the House a year ago. Senate Bill 5235 would require all but a handful of rural counties in the state to allow at least two ADUs on most urban residential lots. 

Bellingham has allowed ADUs — either attached to the main residence or detached — everywhere except the Lake Whatcom watershed since 2018. But Shewmake’s bill has provisions that are still the subject of spirited debate in Bellingham, or appear to be rejected altogether.

SB 5235 would allow absentee homeowners to build ADUs, effectively doubling or tripling the number of units they could rent on their property. Since January, the Bellingham City Council has been debating the same point: whether to waive a 2018 rule requiring the owner to live on the property if they build an ADU.

At a Feb. 13 meeting of the council Planning Committee, council members signaled they would reject that recommendation and keep the owner-occupancy requirement.

The committee, consisting of three of the seven council members, voted unanimously to maintain owner occupancy on properties with ADUs. This was an advisory vote; a final council decision on the new ADU rules isn’t expected for another month or two at least.

Planning committee member Dan Hammill said during the meeting that he had a change of heart about the owner-occupancy rule. Supporters of the rule have said it would prevent investors from buying up houses as rental properties, further shutting out home buyers in an already overheated real estate market.

“I didn’t really believe that there would be a land run on single-family homes and ADUs by investors and developers,” Hammill said, “but … we are seeing that in other states, like California.”

Shewmake, an economics professor at Western Washington University, said arguments claiming investors would buy up Bellingham’s housing stock “don’t make sense from an economic perspective.”

“Ferndale is not experiencing that at all,” Shewmake said. “If anything, Ferndale went farther than Bellingham has” in relaxing ADU regulations.

Ferndale does not require an ADU owner to live on-site but still isn’t receiving as many ADU applications as it would like, Shewmake said. On Feb. 15, Ferndale announced a promotion giving away Metallica-themed T-shirts to the first 10 people who build an ADU on their property.

“Building an ADU is great for Ferndale,” Mayor Greg Hansen said in a news release about the free T-shirts. “It adds to our housing supply, provides opportunities for rentals or aging in place, and utilizes existing city infrastructure.”

“I think Bellingham should be doing this,” Shewmake said — encouraging ADU construction, that is, not giving away T-shirts. “I think they should be bold in doing away with owner occupancy because we’re in a housing crisis.”

Shewmake’s bill also would allow property owners to sell their ADU outright to a prospective homebuyer — what’s being referred to in unwieldy terms as the “condominiumization” of ADUs. The Bellingham City Council hasn’t even begun discussing that option yet.

While a debate persists in Bellingham over whether ADUs are affordable housing or yet another profit opportunity for investors, in any case they are a small piece of the overall housing puzzle. The city has received about 50 building applications for ADUs per year since relaxing its rules in 2018. Over that same period, it has been processing building permits for 700 to 800 units in multifamily dwellings annually.

Given the small role ADUs play in Bellingham’s housing picture, Hammill questioned whether long deliberations over ADU rules were a good use of council’s time. 

“I think spending this amount of time on something that is very, very low impact, and will never be approaching the impact of multifamily or single-family permits to me is just — it’s not quite a fool’s errand, but it sure seems to look like that on the surface,” Hammill said.

In any case, all of the Bellingham council’s work to adopt new ADU rules could be swept away by Shewmake’s bill or separate ADU legislation, the bipartisan House Bill 1337, if either becomes law.

In fact, ADUs are a small piece of what some state lawmakers are trying to do to bring more density to residential neighborhoods. House Bill 1110, which also has bipartisan sponsorship, would effectively eliminate single-family zoning by allowing four- and six-plexes on lots originally intended for one home.

But Shewmake said both ADU bills currently churning through legislative committees remain important. She asserted that encouraging ADUs benefits individual homeowners more than real estate investors.

“I’m not going to build a 50-unit complex,” Shewmake said. “But I could scratch together enough savings to build an ADU and have an impact on my community that’s otherwise left to the big developers.”

While Bellingham leaders consider loosening rules for accessory dwelling units, or ADUs, a state senator from Bellingham is pushing a bill that would go even further to encourage the construction of backyard cottages on the same lot as single-family homes.
Sen. Sharon Shewmake is the lead sponsor of what is essentially the same legislation she championed in the House a year ago. Senate Bill 5235 would require all but a handful of rural counties in the state to allow at least two ADUs on most urban residential lots. 
Bellingham has allowed ADUs — either attached to the main residence or detached — everywhere except the Lake Whatcom watershed since 2018. But Shewmake’s bill has provisions that are still the subject of spirited debate in Bellingham, or appear to be rejected altogether.
SB 5235 would allow absentee homeowners to build ADUs, effectively doubling or tripling the number of units they could rent on their property. Since January, the Bellingham City Council has been debating the same point: whether to waive a 2018 rule requiring the owner to live on the property if they build an ADU.
At a Feb. 13 meeting of the council Planning Committee, council members signaled they would reject that recommendation and keep the owner-occupancy requirement.
The committee, consisting of three of the seven council members, voted unanimously to maintain owner occupancy on properties with ADUs. This was an advisory vote; a final council decision on the new ADU rules isn’t expected for another month or two at least.
Planning committee member Dan Hammill said during the meeting that he had a change of heart about the owner-occupancy rule. Supporters of the rule have said it would prevent investors from buying up houses as rental properties, further shutting out home buyers in an already overheated real estate market.
“I didn’t really believe that there would be a land run on single-family homes and ADUs by investors and developers,” Hammill said, “but … we are seeing that in other states, like California.”
Shewmake, an economics professor at Western Washington University, said arguments claiming investors would buy up Bellingham’s housing stock “don’t make sense from an economic perspective.”
“Ferndale is not experiencing that at all,” Shewmake said. “If anything, Ferndale went farther than Bellingham has” in relaxing ADU regulations.
Ferndale does not require an ADU owner to live on-site but still isn’t receiving as many ADU applications as it would like, Shewmake said. On Feb. 15, Ferndale announced a promotion giving away Metallica-themed T-shirts to the first 10 people who build an ADU on their property.
“Building an ADU is great for Ferndale,” Mayor Greg Hansen said in a news release about the free T-shirts. “It adds to our housing supply, provides opportunities for rentals or aging in place, and utilizes existing city infrastructure.”
“I think Bellingham should be doing this,” Shewmake said — encouraging ADU construction, that is, not giving away T-shirts. “I think they should be bold in doing away with owner occupancy because we’re in a housing crisis.”
Shewmake’s bill also would allow property owners to sell their ADU outright to a prospective homebuyer — what’s being referred to in unwieldy terms as the “condominiumization” of ADUs. The Bellingham City Council hasn’t even begun discussing that option yet.
While a debate persists in Bellingham over whether ADUs are affordable housing or yet another profit opportunity for investors, in any case they are a small piece of the overall housing puzzle. The city has received about 50 building applications for ADUs per year since relaxing its rules in 2018. Over that same period, it has been processing building permits for 700 to 800 units in multifamily dwellings annually.
Given the small role ADUs play in Bellingham’s housing picture, Hammill questioned whether long deliberations over ADU rules were a good use of council’s time. 
“I think spending this amount of time on something that is very, very low impact, and will never be approaching the impact of multifamily or single-family permits to me is just — it’s not quite a fool’s errand, but it sure seems to look like that on the surface,” Hammill said.
In any case, all of the Bellingham council’s work to adopt new ADU rules could be swept away by Shewmake’s bill or separate ADU legislation, the bipartisan House Bill 1337, if either becomes law.
In fact, ADUs are a small piece of what some state lawmakers are trying to do to bring more density to residential neighborhoods. House Bill 1110, which also has bipartisan sponsorship, would effectively eliminate single-family zoning by allowing four- and six-plexes on lots originally intended for one home.
But Shewmake said both ADU bills currently churning through legislative committees remain important. She asserted that encouraging ADUs benefits individual homeowners more than real estate investors.
“I’m not going to build a 50-unit complex,” Shewmake said. “But I could scratch together enough savings to build an ADU and have an impact on my community that’s otherwise left to the big developers.”

State, Bellingham on separate tracks to ease ADU rules  Cascadia Daily News

Read More...

$2 million grant could ready accessory dwelling units for rentals …

(Credit: Courtesy photo)

Thanks to a partnership between Shelter Island Town and the nonprofit Community Development Corporation of Long Island, up to $2 million could be spent over a two-year period in grants to property owners to create affordable accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on their properties.

Chairwoman Elizabeth Hanley of the Community Housing Board announced the grant Feb. 9.

Community Development Corporation (CDC) President and Chief Executive Officer Gwen O’Shea submitted the application and the Island is one of the municipalities that will  benefit from a $2 million grant.

“You really have been the driving force,” Supervisor Gerry Siller said to Ms. Hanley.

Grants of up to $125,000 are available to qualifying low and moderate income homeowners to bring the properties up to local and State codes and retrofit them to accommodate renters. Those who qualify for the grants will either add an ADU to their property, or make capital improvements to an existing ADU.

The CDC will work with the Town to coordinate the program, which will be managed by the CDC.

Property owners who want to participate in the program would have to apply for grants administered by the CDC,  Ms. Hanley said.

Homeowners who opt to take advantage of a grant have to agree to provide the rental at an affordable rate set by the federal department of Housing and Urban Development. Rentals would be available to those who meet income levels set for Suffolk County.  Occupants must be annually certified to ensure they continue to qualify for an affordable rental, Ms. Hanley said.

In addition, it’s possible a homeowner could apply for grant money from State, County and/or local municipalities if they need to updgrade their septic systems to state-of-the-art nitrogen-reducing systems.

(Credit: Courtesy photo)

Thanks to a partnership between Shelter Island Town and the nonprofit Community Development Corporation of Long Island, up to $2 million could be spent over a two-year period in grants to property owners to create affordable accessory dwelling units (ADUs) on their properties.

Chairwoman Elizabeth Hanley of the Community Housing Board announced the grant Feb. 9.

Community Development Corporation (CDC) President and Chief Executive Officer Gwen O’Shea submitted the application and the Island is one of the municipalities that will  benefit from a $2 million grant.

“You really have been the driving force,” Supervisor Gerry Siller said to Ms. Hanley.

Grants of up to $125,000 are available to qualifying low and moderate income homeowners to bring the properties up to local and State codes and retrofit them to accommodate renters. Those who qualify for the grants will either add an ADU to their property, or make capital improvements to an existing ADU.

The CDC will work with the Town to coordinate the program, which will be managed by the CDC.

Property owners who want to participate in the program would have to apply for grants administered by the CDC,  Ms. Hanley said.

Homeowners who opt to take advantage of a grant have to agree to provide the rental at an affordable rate set by the federal department of Housing and Urban Development. Rentals would be available to those who meet income levels set for Suffolk County.  Occupants must be annually certified to ensure they continue to qualify for an affordable rental, Ms. Hanley said.

In addition, it’s possible a homeowner could apply for grant money from State, County and/or local municipalities if they need to updgrade their septic systems to state-of-the-art nitrogen-reducing systems.

$2 million grant could ready accessory dwelling units for rentals …  Shelter Island Reporter

Read More...